[xdebug-general] Re: Weird behaviour with conditionals

From: Derick Rethans <derick[@]xdebug.org>
Date: Fri, 29 Oct 2004 16:25:20 +0200 (CEST)

On Fri, 29 Oct 2004, Michiel Rook wrote:

>
> > What do you mean with "more strict" ? :)
>
> Well, as far as I can see, xdebug_stop_code_coverage() erases coverage
> information in 2.X, and retains it in 1.3, right?

yes, unless you pass "false" as parameter to the function (without
quotes). That should also still work in the 1.3 version without throwing
an error.

regards,
Derick

-- 
Xdebug | http://xdebug.org | xdebug-general@lists.xdebug.org
Received on Fri Oct 29 2004 - 16:25:35 BST

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Mon Jun 25 2018 - 06:00:04 BST