[xdebug-general] Re: Weird behaviour with conditionals

On Fri, 29 Oct 2004, Michiel Rook wrote:

>
> > What do you mean with "more strict" ? :)
>
> Well, as far as I can see, xdebug_stop_code_coverage() erases coverage
> information in 2.X, and retains it in 1.3, right?

yes, unless you pass "false" as parameter to the function (without
quotes). That should also still work in the 1.3 version without throwing
an error.

regards,
Derick

-- 
Xdebug | http://xdebug.org | xdebug-general@lists.xdebug.org