[xdebug-general] Re: Weird behaviour with conditionals

From: Michiel Rook <michiel[@]trendserver.nl>
Date: Fri, 29 Oct 2004 16:08:17 +0200

> What do you mean with "more strict" ? :)

Well, as far as I can see, xdebug_stop_code_coverage() erases coverage
information in 2.X, and retains it in 1.3, right?

Michiel
Received on Fri Oct 29 2004 - 16:08:30 BST

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Derick Rethans: "[xdebug-general] Re: Weird behaviour with conditionals"
Previous message: Derick Rethans: "[xdebug-general] Re: Weird behaviour with conditionals"
In reply to: Derick Rethans: "[xdebug-general] Re: Weird behaviour with conditionals"
Next in thread: Derick Rethans: "[xdebug-general] Re: Weird behaviour with conditionals"
Reply: Derick Rethans: "[xdebug-general] Re: Weird behaviour with conditionals"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ] [ by messages with attachments ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Mon Jun 25 2018 - 06:00:04 BST