[zeta] Re: [call for review] Keeping the eZ Publish Community in the loop

On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 12:12 PM, Benjamin Eberlei <kontakt[@]beberlei.de>wrote:

> We still not have a decision on the naming of Zeta in the future, which
> should be reflected in the post. It might be necessary to rename the
> project given the Apache Trademarks decision. Also i don't think it should
> be linked to the Github repository yet since that can still change due to
> the naming issue, so maybe split the article into two articles and just
> publish the current state for now with a reference to future posts about
> the final decisions?
>

Good idea
Final version here
https://docs.google.com/a/ez.no/document/d/1SLuBI6HQqX_PJnswCOaV6MyW2AbOd0-1wTDwhHIf3f4/edit
Will be published next monday.

-- 
Nicolas
>
> greetings,
> Benjamin
>
> On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 12:07 PM, Nicolas Pastorino <nfrp[@]ez.no> wrote:
>
> > Hi everyone,
> >
> > I just stumbled upon this, which is clearly cracking open the news :
> >
> >
> http://www.h-online.com/open/news/item/Zeta-Components-leaves-the-Apache-Foundation-1575327.html
> >
> > and wondered whether I could go ahead and publish by the eZ Community
> (blog
> > post openly crafted here :
> >
> >
> https://docs.google.com/a/ez.no/document/d/1SLuBI6HQqX_PJnswCOaV6MyW2AbOd0-1wTDwhHIf3f4/edit
> >  )
> >
> > Cheers,
> > --
> > Nicolas
> >
> > On Thu, May 3, 2012 at 6:28 PM, Nicolas Pastorino <nfrp[@]ez.no> wrote:
> >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > On Thu, Apr 26, 2012 at 9:21 PM, Benjamin Eberlei <kontakt[@]beberlei.de
> > >wrote:
> > >
> > >> The naming is completely undecided yet, we have contacted apache
> > >> trademarks, since we don't know how to proceed.
> > >>
> > >
> > > Ok, and thanks Julien for raising the point too.
> > > I will then wait until we receive a response from the foundation.
> > >
> > >
> > >>
> > >> Also i agree with julien, the inactivity was the major reason to
> retire
> > >> from ASF, since we couldnt follow procedure with quarterly reports
> > anymore
> > >> due to lack of time and didnt manage to get a first release under
> Apache
> > >> flag out.
> > >>
> > >
> > > This point was added to the post.
> > >
> > >
> > >>
> > >> The seperation of components into their own repositories are also done
> > to
> > >> seperate the maintained from the unmaintained ones more easily :-)
> > >>
> > >
> > > Added too.
> > >
> > > The draft still is available here :
> > >
> > >
> >
> https://docs.google.com/a/ez.no/document/d/1SLuBI6HQqX_PJnswCOaV6MyW2AbOd0-1wTDwhHIf3f4/edit
> > >
> > > Thanks everyone for the feedback,
> > > Awaiting the final name before publishing, feel free to send additional
> > > input in the meantime,
> > > --
> > > Nicolas
> > >
> > >
> > >>
> > >> On Thu, Apr 26, 2012 at 1:56 PM, Julien Vermillard <
> > jvermillard[@]gmail.com
> > >> >wrote:
> > >>
> > >> > Hi,
> > >> >
> > >> > Even if I think it's a good idea to keep the community in the loop I
> > >> > would like to remeber two points :
> > >> > - the zeta podling retirement vote was start due to lack of progress
> > >> > - if you want to use the Apache/ASF word you need to contact the
> > >> > Apache PR for that
> > >> >
> > >> > Julien
> > >> >
> > >> > On Thu, Apr 26, 2012 at 11:35 AM, Nicolas Pastorino <nfrp[@]ez.no>
> > wrote:
> > >> > > Dear everyone,
> > >> > >
> > >> > > I thought it would be wise to keep the eZ Publish Community in the
> > >> loop,
> > >> > > since they are likely to be the largest share of AZC users today.
> > >> > >
> > >> > > Here is a small blog-post, on which I would love to have your
> input
> > :
> > >> > >
> > >> >
> > >>
> >
> https://docs.google.com/a/ez.no/document/d/1SLuBI6HQqX_PJnswCOaV6MyW2AbOd0-1wTDwhHIf3f4/edit
> > >> > > (anyone
> > >> > > should be able to edit it, or make remarks through comments).
> > >> > >
> > >> > > I hope this fits you well and I am looking forward to your
> feedback
> > !
> > >> > > --
> > >> > > Nicolas
> > >> >
> > >>
> > >
> > >
> >
>