On Wed, 8 Aug 2007, Damjan Cvetko wrote:
> I'm sending you the code directly, as I don't want to trash the list with it.
(I'm cc-ing the list again - hope you don't mind)
> The code is a real mess, as it was planned for a base of a C application. I'm
> sure it can be blocked (network wise) as I was stuck not using threads or
> other fancy network methods. If you think it has potential to bundle this
> proxy with the package, I'll rewrite parts of the code to make it more robust
> (better low level network handling and perhaps true nonblocking sockets). The
> -m parameter (multiple sessions) is also not handled at all.
Thanks for sending it, I'll give it a spin a bit later this week, and
then also dive a bit more in the code.
> It sometimes leaves my dbgp client in a non finished socket state and I cant
> figure why. If you have a clue to why I'd appreciate it.
Because it's sometimes, I wouldn't know :)
> Another question. DBGP specification doesn't say anything about a reply to
> proxystop command. Currently the implementation does not return anything.
Hmm, you are right. I would assume it should return this though:
<proxystop success="1"/>
regards,
Derick
-- Xdebug | http://xdebug.org | xdebug-general@lists.xdebug.orgReceived on Thu Aug 09 2007 - 09:47:46 BST
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Mon Jun 25 2018 - 06:00:04 BST