Am 14.12.2015 um 22:00 schrieb Derick Rethans:
> Hi Rainer!
>
> On Mon, 14 Dec 2015, Rainer Jung wrote:
>
>> I'm testing XDebug 2.4.0RC3 in combination with PHP 7.0.0 on Solaris
>> 10 Sparc.
>>
>> I'm seeing crashes with slightly unclear reproducibility. I wonder
>> whether they are related to your issue #1229 (crashes because of -O2
>> for GCC 4.8). I'm using GCC 4.9.3 in combination with -O2.
>>
>> The issue says same code gets removed under -O2. What part of the code
>> is it? I'd like to check, whether that's also happening for gcc 4.9.3.
>> Could you please provide any details?
>
> It was line 1004 in xdebug_var.c - the one just above this one:
>
>> #2 0xfe9d555c in xdebug_var_export (struc=0xffbfe528, struc[@]entry=0xffbfe5ec,
>> str=str[@]entry=0xffbfe59c, level=level[@]entry=1, debug_zval=debug_zval[@]entry=0,
>> options=options[@]entry=0x2398c0) at /tmp/pear/temp/xdebug/xdebug_var.c:1005
>> tmpz = 0x0
>> myht = <optimized out>
>> tmp_str = <optimized out>
>> is_temp = 0
>> num = <optimized out>
>> key = <optimized out>
>> val = <optimized out>
>>
>> The tmpz 0x0 looks fishy to me, also I don't see how it could crash in this
>> line (but it could in the next effective line). See below.
>
> So it looks GCC 4.9 is affected too, for some reason, the
>
> zval *tmpz = &((*struc)->value.ref->val);
>
> Got removed while compiling... Removing -O2 fixed it, but I am wondering
> whether I am not doing something really wrong and that the compiler is
> right? If you could provide some insight, that'd be awesome.
Wild guess: Maybe because tmpz is only declared locally in that block,
so goes out of scope immediately after line 1005. I don't know what the
C specs say, but wouldn't using &tmpz after that block result in
undefined behavior?
I tried moving the declaration of tmpz higher up:
980 void xdebug_var_export(zval **struc, xdebug_str *str, int
level, int debug_zval, xdebug_var_export_options *options TSRMLS_DC)
981 {
982 HashTable *myht;
983 char* tmp_str;
984 int is_temp;
985 #if PHP_VERSION_ID >= 70000
986 zend_ulong num;
987 zend_string *key;
988 zval *val;
989 zval *tmpz;
990 #endif
(line 989 added) and then the crash does not happen, not even with -O2.
The disassembled xdebug_var_export() differs indeed, but I didn't try t
understand the difference in detail.
Not sure whether that's convincing, but maybe you can try on other
platforms or with your reproduction scenario as well.
HTH!
Rainer
Received on Mon Dec 14 2015 - 22:18:52 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Mon Jun 25 2018 - 06:00:04 BST