[xdebug-general] Re: Profiling a Joomla page -- huge mismatch between xdebug profiling information and actual performance

From: Emiliano Heyns <Emiliano.Heyns[@]iris-advies.nl>
Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2009 18:02:53 +0200

I'm using wincachegrind, currently, but I have a linux system at home
I could use for other clients. How so? Would different data be
reported by different viewers?

Met vriendelijke groet,
Emiliano Heyns

On 30 mrt 2009, at 17:43, A Paella <apaella[@]gmail.com> wrote:

> Wich client are you using to visualize the cachegrind file?
> On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 3:07 PM, Emiliano Heyns
> <Emiliano.Heyns[@]iris-advies.nl> wrote:
>> Hi,
>> We're trying to find out why our pages are loading so slow (12-13
>> seconds),
>> so we've ran xdebug against it, which is showing that the page
>> executes in
>> 1.5 seconds. It's not a network delay, as we've loaded this page
>> from the
>> console of the webserver itself, using lynx (so no javascript, css
>> or images
>> causing the slowdown, either). The slowdown appears to be at the
>> "tail" of
>> the request, since the timestamp for the request in the apache log
>> and the
>> timestamp of the xdebug output file are the same. Does anyone have
>> any idea
>> where else we might look?
>> Thanks,
>> Emile
Received on Mon Mar 30 2009 - 18:03:06 BST

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Mon Jun 25 2018 - 06:00:04 BST