[xdebug-general] Re: isset & empty not shown in traces

From: Sean Coates <sean[@]caedmon.net>
Date: Wed, 02 May 2007 17:25:29 -0400

Yannick Warnier wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'm using xdebug 2.0.0 RC3. Is there a reason why calls to isset() and
> empty() are not reported in traces?

I suspect for the same reason that instanceof and == are not shown in
traces (they're not actual functions).

S
Received on Wed May 02 2007 - 23:25:42 BST

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Jun Monnai: "[xdebug-general] Re: An improvement idea for breakpoint_set command"
Previous message: Yannick Warnier: "[xdebug-general] isset & empty not shown in traces"
In reply to: Yannick Warnier: "[xdebug-general] isset & empty not shown in traces"
Next in thread: Derick Rethans: "[xdebug-general] Re: isset & empty not shown in traces"
Reply: Derick Rethans: "[xdebug-general] Re: isset & empty not shown in traces"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ] [ by messages with attachments ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Mon Jun 25 2018 - 06:00:04 BST