[xdebug-general] Re: Is the xdebug's non-free license necessary?

From: Derick Rethans <derick[@]xdebug.org>
Date: Tue, 21 Dec 2004 10:44:30 +0100 (CET)

On Mon, 20 Dec 2004, Josh Triplett wrote:

> >>This is much broader. For example, I cannot write a derivative called
> >>"Brian's Xdebug" or "Xdebug manual" or even "A third-party manual for
> >>Xdebug".
> >
> > The manual is no problem, that's not a derived product.
> It could very well be a derivative; a manual might want to copy some of
> the code for illustrative purposes, or copy various comments.

IMO just copying a tiny bit of code or copying various comments does not
make something a derivate. I mean, com'on, other people can come up with
those same comments or tiny bits of code.


Xdebug | http://xdebug.org | xdebug-general@lists.xdebug.org
Received on Tue Dec 21 2004 - 10:44:36 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Mon Jun 25 2018 - 06:00:04 BST